In The garden of forking paths Jorge Luis Borges describes a novel where a character can choose a path such that it does not eliminate the option of pursuing a mutually exclusive path. Thus, the character can traverses a future wherein their paths diverge and then converge again, thereby allowing alternative possibilities to occur simultaneously. This fictional labyrinth is a fitting metaphor for understanding the hyperlinked, hyper-reality of the world wide web where infinite possibilities are laid out before the user like a labyrinth and they can walk along an endless trail along forking paths.
For my RIP.MIX.FEED activity I decided to return to my enduring interest in the value of storytelling in education. For this particular activity I used pinterest to pin resources on how web 2.0 facilitates collaborative and interactive storytelling. I have gathered resources in the following broad categories:
Lenny Bruce reached his peak as a nightclub performer in the 1950’s. Lenny’s routine was considered risqué for the era because of his use of obscenities and discussion of sex, drugs and religion. On April 3 1964, Lenny was arrested on obscenity charges on the basis of his performance at the Cafe Au Go Go in Greenwich Village. The indictment had been procured by presenting a transcript of Lenny’s routine before a 23 member grand jury. During the trial, the prosecution presented its evidence by calling on a police officer to read from the transcript of Lenny’s routine. Lenny just shook his head and said: “I’m going to be judged by his bad timing, his ego, his garbled language.” Lenny Bruce knew he was beaten because his oral text was going to be presented devoid of context.
Socrates, despite having a reputation as the foremost Greek philosopher who challenged the religion, philosophy, culture and the government of his time, is not credited as the author of any literary works. Instead, Socrates’ philosophical views were passed on through two of his students who learned at the feet of the master through oral discourse. In A History of Western Philosophy Bertrand Russell discusses the two philosophers who wrote extensively about Socrates – Xenophon and Plato. Plato has earned a stronger reputation because of his skillful writing. However, Plato often utilized the character of Socrates as a mouthpiece for his own opinions in order to hang his more subversive opinions on a man who had already been convicted and executed. Xenophon, on the other hand, presents Socrates as an honourable man who is less subversive. “There has been a tendency to think that everything Xenophon says must be true, because he had not the wits to think of anything untrue.” (Russell, 1971) Is Plato’s Socrates from Phaedrus a close approximation of the historical Socrates or is he entirely a literary invention facilitated by the invention of writing? Is this what Socrates means when he talks about writing presenting only a semblance of the truth? The irony is that Plato uses a fictitious Socrates as a literary figure to denounce writing, when in fact, Plato (the actual author) passed on the (alleged) words of the speaker (Socrates) through the written word.